5 Things You Shouldn’t Do When Changing Production Accounting Systems

Until fairly recently, it was a straight choice between a traditional expensive production accounting system and using spreadsheets. Companies that went down the systems route found themselves with an inflexible solution that was difficult to change and even harder to upgrade.

Like you, they felt they had little choice but to continue to ride the roundabout of hugely expensive installation and maintenance costs. To pay the prohibitive cost of upgrades. Face the disruption of the associated upgrade project. All just to get continued poor support. They thought they had to live with the inflexibility of the platform and the need for consultants to make changes.

Sound familiar? What can you do about it?

The advent of cloud technology means there is a very real alternative that eliminates all of the pains of traditional software systems.

More than 70% of people who have moved to the EnergySys Cloud Platform did so from a traditional on-premises system. And most of these were using Tieto’s Energy Components product, so we know a lot about the migration process.

That's not to say that migrating to the cloud is effortless. But it is a lot easier and a lot less costly than you'd think.

Download this paper and find out why upgrading your current solution, going out to tender or assuming all software solutions are the same, could be costing you more time and money than migrating to a better system.

 

Is your production accounting software costing you more than money?

You deserve better

Just like every other part of your business, production accounting is more efficient and produces better results when it is tailored to your requirements. However, with traditional systems like Energy Components these customisations present users with problems right from the start.